Home > 

‘We lost the match on day 1 at 9 AM’: Tamil Nadu coach blames captain’s decision at toss after loss


The prestigious Ranji Trophy is inching towards a gripping finale as Mumbai, with a storied legacy in the tournament, marches into the final for a record 48th time after defeating Tamil Nadu. The semi-final clash, which showcased Mumbai’s cricketing prowess, ended on a particularly sour note for the Tamil Nadu team, captained by R Sai Kishore. They delivered an underwhelming performance with the bat across both innings that ultimately sealed their fate.

Following the match, Tamil Nadu’s head coach Sulakshan Kulkarni made comments that sparked debate and attention. He attributed the team’s heavy defeat to a critical decision at the commencement of the game—the captain’s choice to bat first upon winning the toss. Kulkarni elaborated that there had been a concrete preparation in place, with the expectation that bowling first would be the preferable strategy. He cited his personal insight as a former player familiar with Mumbai’s conditions to back up the argument that they should have initiated the match with their bowling attack.

“I always speak straightforward—we lost the match at 9 o’clock on day one,” Kulkarni stated, reflecting on the moment the decision was made. He had realized the implications when he saw the seam-friendly wicket that was provided, knowing too well that it would demand an exceptional level of play from Tamil Nadu to vie for a win.

However, despite the coach’s well-grounded intuitions, Captain Sai Kishore had a conflicting gut feeling, a decision that later on did not translate well onto the field. Tamil Nadu’s opening batter, Sai Sudharsan, fell on the fourth ball, and the disarray continued as they found themselves reeling with a score of 42/5. The coach’s words underscored the captain’s autonomy in the final call, “Ultimately he [Sai Kishore] is the boss. I can give my feedback and inputs (on) the kind of wickets and Mumbai’s mindset also.”

Tamil Nadu’s innings culminated in a paltry total of 146 runs. In a remarkable turn of events, their bowlers reignited a glimmer of hope by throttling Mumbai’s lineup to 106/7. However, Mumbai’s resilience shone through, particularly in their lower batting order. Shardul Thakur notably swung the momentum with a resolute century, once again exemplifying the depth in Mumbai’s squad.

The woes for Tamil Nadu persisted when they took the field again. The pressure was palpable, and the batsmen failed to stand their ground, crumbling to a mere 162. Only Baba Indrajith showed some resistance with a valiant score of 70, but it wasn’t enough to surmount the substantial lead amassed by Mumbai, who had rallied to 378 thanks to Tanush Kotian’s exuberant 89-run knock.

Mumbai’s triumph was not merely a testament to their batting might but also an illustration of strategical supremacy and adapting to the match conditions. The semi-final match laid bare the essential facets of decision-making in cricket, where the interpretation of conditions and a single strategic decision at the toss can swing the fate of the game.

The Ranji Trophy, a crucible for honing and showcasing domestic talent in India, once again proved to be a battleground where experience, instinct, and on-the-spot judgment calls weave the outcome of its thrilling contests. As Mumbai celebrates its entry into another final, Tamil Nadu will reflect on what could have been had they capitalized on that crucial early advantage. This match will undoubtedly be remembered not just for the performances on the field but also for the contentious decision made at the toss—a decisive factor that can dictate the ebb and flow of cricket’s unpredictable narrative.