Home > 

Sobhita Dhulipala Reflects on the Impact of ‘Monkey Man’ on Her Career


The industry buzz is all about Sobhita Dhulipala as she opens up about the transformative experience of working on Dev Patel’s directorial debut, ‘Monkey Man’. Dhulipala shared personal insights into her journey as an actor, her contemplations on the archetype of a commercial film star in India, and how this particular project shifted the trajectory of her life.

Sobhita Dhulipala, in a heartfelt conversation reported by Deadline, expressed her initial skepticism about the prospects of ‘Monkey Man’, questioning its release and the entities that would champion its distribution. Little did she foresee the eventual, elegantly executed global launch. She philosophically noted, “Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans.”

Hailing from Andhra Pradesh, Dhulipala’s leap into acting traces a familiar path through the corridors of beauty pageants, mirroring the beginnings of Indian celebrities like Priyanka Chopra and Aishwarya Rai. She broke away from a course in corporate law to shine as Miss Earth India in 2013 and then made a magnetic acting debut in Anurag Kashyap’s critically acclaimed ‘Raman Raghav 2.0’.

Despite her presence in various regional cinemas, including Telugu, Malayalam, and Tamil industries, it was her enigmatic portrayal of Tara Khanna in ‘Made in Heaven’ that brought her to mainstream awareness. However, her artistic inclinations have always gravitated towards the alternative. Dhulipala dissects the public perception of actors, critiquing the lack of personal accountability expected from commercial film stars in India. She envisions a more intimate connection with roles that resonate and linger with the audience, a distinction that often places her in a niche category.

Dhulipala’s noteworthy performance in ‘Monkey Man’ punctuates this narrative. Cast in 2019 following an intensive audition process, Dhulipala embodied the role of Sita with compelling nuance. The film, shot on an Indonesian island amidst the pressuring silence of a lockdown and co-produced by the visionary Jordan Peele, took four painstaking years before claiming its stake in the international market.

In ‘Monkey Man’, Dhulipala appears in a pivotal role, portraying a prostitute entangled in the morose life of the brothel where Kid, the main character played by Patel, later resides. Patel himself has lauded Dhulipala for her profound ability to convey suffering with an evident allure. The neo-noir action thriller sharply contrasts with the serene personality of Dhulipala, who ironically finds solace in introversion.

The global limelight now shining on her is a stark change from her preferred solitude, where she jokingly undervalues her life experiences, including a bout with typhoid, when prompted to share personal stories. It’s a stark irony for an actress whose on-screen presence is anything but understated.

Dhulipala’s career stands out in an age where digital platforms have catapulted regional talents onto the global stage. She’s managed to carve out a unique space in an industry where predecessors like Chopra and Deepika Padukone have predominantly pursued Bollywood. She humorously recounts a discussion where she was distinguished for being South Indian in Mumbai’s Bollywood, focusing on her regional roots amidst the broader Indian identity.

Fiercely opposed to pigeonholes and stereotypes, Dhulipala laughs off the shallow conceptions of Indian culture often represented by the clichéd ‘tandoori’ and ‘balle balle’ imagery. Instead, she invites inquisitive minds to a more elaborate narrative about India’s rich cultural landscape — if they have a spare quarter hour to delve into what she wittily describes as a ‘full Chat GPT-style lowdown’.

As Dhulipala navigates the aftermath of her latest cinematic voyage and evaluates the cultural and professional implications, she stands testament to the unpredictability of life and career in the fervently evolving world of cinema.

This story has been sourced from third-party syndicated content. The publication recognizes no obligation for the reliability or accuracy of the data provided.