Home > 

Clarification on Viral Selfie with Rahul and Sonia Gandhi: Artwork Misidentified


A recently circulated selfie featuring prominent Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi, proudly displaying their inked fingers, has set social media abuzz. The image garnered significant attention, not just for the noted political figures but for the painting glimpsed in the background, which sparked a flurry of speculation and misinformation. Some users misleadingly claimed that the artwork depicted Jesus Christ, leading to a wave of debates and assertions across various platforms.

However, a detailed examination and subsequent reporting by NewsMobile have conclusively dispelled these claims. The investigation revealed that the painting in question contained three distinct red dots, an unusual feature not commonly associated with traditional representations of Jesus Christ. This critical detail prompted further scrutiny into the painting’s origins and artist.

The revelation took a turn when the artwork was conclusively traced back to a website known as MeisterDrucke, a recognized platform for art lovers and collectors. It was identified as “Madonna Oriflamma, 1932,” a notable work by the celebrated Russian artist Nicholas Roerich. This finding provided clear evidence that overturned the erroneous claims circulating on social media.

Nicholas Roerich, a name synonymous with multifaceted talent, was not just an artist but also an accomplished writer, archaeologist, theosophist, and public figure. Renowned in Russia and around the world, Roerich was a luminary in the fields of art and spirituality. His contributions extended beyond visual art, imbuing philosophical and spiritual narratives that resonated deeply within Russian society and beyond.

Roerich’s influence was particularly pronounced during a time when Russia was experiencing a vibrant movement towards spiritual and philosophical reflection.

Join Get ₹99!

. His works often captured this essence, incorporating symbolic and evocative elements that spoke to his deep engagement with theosophical and philosophical ideas. “Madonna Oriflamma” stands as a testament to his intricate style and rich symbolic language.

“Madonna Oriflamma, 1932,” an exemplar of Roerich’s symbolic artistry, showcases his adeptness at weaving complex iconography within his works. The painting itself, with its distinctive characteristics and symbolic resonance, is a classic example of Roerich’s style, reflecting themes of spirituality and enlightenment rather than a reference to Jesus Christ.

The misidentification and subsequent veracity check highlight the critical importance of thorough fact-checking, especially in the age of rapid information dissemination via social media. In a world where visual impressions can quickly turn into viral phenomena, the erroneous interpretation of the Gandhis’ background painting underscores a larger issue regarding the speed and accuracy of information sharing.

The clarification drawn from this investigation serves as a reminder to both the public and media alike about the necessity for careful verification of information before accepting and spreading claims. The quick assumption that the painting was of Jesus Christ and the ensuing discussions pointedly illustrate the ease with which misinformation can proliferate and create false narratives.

The developments around this viral selfie have not only clarified the actual nature of the painting but have also brought to light the impressive work and legacy of Nicholas Roerich. It’s a poignant reminder of how easily facts can be distorted and the significance of recognizing and respecting artistic heritage and historical accuracy.

In conclusion, the viral portrait that momentarily stirred a swirl of misinformation does not depict Jesus Christ, as initially speculated. Instead, it is a profound artwork by Nicholas Roerich, titled “Madonna Oriflamma, 1932.” This fact-based clarification decisively rectifies the misguided claims, reinforcing the critical need for diligent fact-checking and informed discourse in an age where truth can often be a casualty of viral misinformation.