Mumbai: In a significant development on Friday, Bollywood actor and filmmaker Kangana Ranaut announced that she has received multiple cut requests from the Central Board for Film Certification (CBFC) for her upcoming directorial venture, “Emergency.” Ranaut, who has always been vocal about her perspectives in the film industry, termed these suggestions as “quite unreasonable” and asserted that her team is prepared to defend the film’s integrity.
The actor, who dons many hats as the director, co-producer, and lead actor of the film portraying the late Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, issued a statement following media reports. The reports indicated that the CBFC has asked for 13 specific cuts in the movie before it can be certified for release. Despite these requests, Ranaut emphasized that the team is steadfast in maintaining the film’s authenticity.
The film, set against the backdrop of the Emergency period in India, has been a subject of controversy. Early media reports highlight that the CBFC’s revising committee called for the cuts, which include adding disclaimers, deleting certain dialogues and scenes, and providing factual evidence for historical references depicted in the film. These modifications, according to the board, are necessary to grant the movie a U/A certificate.
“We’ve received requests for cuts, but while feedback is always welcome, some of the suggestions seem quite unreasonable,” said Ranaut in her statement. She further illuminated the positive feedback from historians and review committee members who have viewed the film. “Most historians and members of the review committee who’ve seen it have praised it as the most faithful depiction of a leader,” Ranaut added.
“They’ve especially appreciated our unwavering commitment to the truth, without compromising even the smallest detail. Their endorsement is encouraging, affirming that we’ve honored the story as it deserves. Nevertheless, we are ready to stand our ground and protect the film’s integrity, ensuring its essence remains intact,” she remarked.
The film’s release has also faced opposition from certain Sikh organizations, including the Shiromani Akali Dal, who accuse it of misrepresenting the community and distorting historical facts. Due to these objections, the controversy surrounding the film has intensified.
.
Zee Entertainment Enterprises, the co-producer of “Emergency,” has escalated the matter to the Bombay High Court, seeking a directive for the CBFC to issue a certification for the film. In response, the CBFC, represented by its counsel Abhinav Chandrachud, informed the court on Thursday that a certificate would be provided if the suggested cuts by the revising committee are implemented.
“The committee has suggested some cuts before a certificate can be issued and the movie can be released,” said Chandrachud. Therefore, the movie’s team is now faced with the decision of whether or not to accept these cuts. To deliberate on this significant decision, the bench has scheduled another hearing for September 30.
Last week, Zee Entertainment accused the CBFC of withholding the certificate for political reasons, particularly due to the impending elections in Haryana. This assertion has added another layer of complexity to the ongoing controversy.
Ranaut previously accused the censor board of deliberately stalling the certification process to delay the film’s release, which was originally set for September 6. This contention, coupled with the CBFC’s recent requests for cuts, has contributed to the tension surrounding the film’s release schedule.
“We are prepared to stand our ground and safeguard the integrity of ‘Emergency,’ ensuring the essence of the film remains intact,” Ranaut reiterated. Her firm stance is indicative of the resolve and determination with which she approaches both her film career and her creative projects.
The pending decision on whether to move forward with the suggested cuts or confront the CBFC’s mandates underscores a broader dialogue on artistic freedom and historical representation in Indian cinema. Ranaut’s commitment to preserving her creative vision while navigating institutional and political challenges sheds light on the ongoing struggles that filmmakers often face.
As the hearings progress and the film’s future hangs in the balance, the outcome of this high-profile dispute will likely influence forthcoming projects in Bollywood, particularly those that delve into historical and political subjects. For now, the eyes of the industry and the public remain fixed on the unfolding drama surrounding “Emergency.”
