Home > 

Rajasthan Royals Captain Sanju Samson Docked 30% Match Fee Over Dissent Incident

In what turned out to be a pivotal moment in the high-stakes TATA Indian Premier League 2024 clash between the Rajasthan Royals and Delhi Capitals, captain Sanju Samson has been penalized for an act of dissent against the third umpire’s decision. Sanju Samson faced a hefty fine, with the Indian Premier League’s governing body imposing a 30% deduction on his match fees following an on-field dispute relating to his dismissal in the game held at Arun Jaitley Stadium in Delhi on May 07, 2024.

This penalty ensued when the Rajasthan Royals skipper challenged the decision of the third umpire post-announcement of his dismissal during the 56th match of the IPL’s 17th edition. Samson was seen engaging in a discussion with the on-field umpires, KN Ananthapadmanabhan and Ulhas Gandhe after television umpire Michael Gough ruled him out. The disagreement marked the breach of Article 2.8 of the IPL’s Code of Conduct, which caters to showing dissent to an umpire’s decision during a match.

“The incident unfolded when an attempted pull shot sent by Sanju soared towards the long-on boundary, where it appeared to have been cleanly caught by West Indies cricketer Shai Hope. Following procedure, the decision was escalated to the third umpire for further scrutiny. Michael Gough took into account several camera angles before delivering a verdict that reinforced Hope’s claim, having found no evidence of contact between the ball or Hope and the boundary skirting, validating the catch and the wicket,” the statement detailed.

The official lament went on to confirm, “Mr Sanju Samson, Captain, Rajasthan Royals has been fined 30 percent of his match fees for breaching the IPL Code of Conduct during Match 56 against Delhi Capitals. Samson committed a Level 1 offence. He admitted to the offence and accepted the Match Referee’s sanction. For Level 1 breaches of the Code of Conduct, the Match Referee’s decision is final and binding.”

The visible dissatisfaction from Samson and the futile attempt to utilize the Decision Review System (DRS) revealed the tension within the Royals camp over the call. The incident didn’t just stir the captain; it also visibly affected the Rajasthan Royals’ Director of Cricket, Kumar Sangakkara, who was captured in moments of distress, repeatedly reviewing the video replay.

Despite the objection, the match persisted without further delay, and Samson retreated back to the pavilion. The repercussion of the controversial decision was significant; Rajasthan Royals found themselves in a tough spot as the asking rate escalated following their captain’s departure. Ultimately, Samson’s wicket signified the game’s turning point—Rajasthan couldn’t cope with the mounting pressure and finished 20 runs behind the target, propelling Delhi Capitals to victory.

This incident not only affected the match outcome but also stirred debates about the game’s spirit and the effectiveness of the available technology. The heavy fine on Samson’s dissent points to the IPL’s strict adherence to its Code of Conduct, reaffirming the utmost respect for the umpire’s decision is non-negotiable, regardless of the stakes in a competition as grand as the Indian Premier League. Balancing the passion for the sport with respect for its laws and umpiring decisions continues to be a directive that all players, irrespective of their status or role, are expected to adhere to within the IPL and cricket at large.