Home > 

‘A Killer Paradox’ series review: Bloody K-drama thriller wastes its potential to be a compelling character study


In recent times, the South Korean media industry has struck gold with a new trend, mining stories from the rich vein of webtoons and transforming these narratives into binge-worthy screen adaptations. While the jump to the digital platform initially favored the flourishing of romance genres, there’s been a noticeable pivot towards the darker, more visceral tales, with a particular pull towards stories steeped in blood and shadows. The latest Netflix offering, “A Killer Paradox,” epitomizes this new wave, bringing with it a shiver-inducing thriller vibe, yet falling just short of achieving the depth of character exploration audiences hoped for.

Helming this edgy narrative is director Lee Chang-hee, previously recognized for his venture into the grim with “Hell Is Other People” (2019). This time around, Chang-hee deftly threads needles of dark humor through the grim tapestry of homicide. At the heart of “A Killer Paradox” is Lee Tang, portrayed by Choi Woo-shik – whose previous claim to fame was his role in the critically acclaimed “Parasite” (2019). Tang, a beleaguered college student, muses on the mundanity of his life with a lone wish to witness the Rocky Mountains in Canada. However, his life pinwheels into chaos when, on his way back from a part-time job, he is sucked into a violent encounter, culminating in an impulsive act of self-defense against an antagonist who turns out to be a fugitive killer.

This unforeseen pivot propels Tang into a chain of lethal confrontations, portraying him as a crusader meting out justice to societal scourges. Enshrouded in an aura that ranges from accidental heroism to chilling compulsion, Tang’s “power” accrues a body count of evildoers. Concurrently, the storyline introduces Son Suk-ku as detective Jang Nan-gam, a world-weary law enforcer who trails the blood-soaked path Tang unwittingly charts. However, catching Tang proves arduous as serendipitous twists seem to shield him, scrubbing clean any incriminating traces he leaves behind.

The tension between Nan-gam and Tang unfurls as the central narrative of the show, delicately orchestrated throughout the cat-and-mouse chase. Though the series delivers taut action sequences and jaw-dropping moments of violence, its brightest moments are in solitude – when the writing delves into the nuanced interiors of its characters’ psyches. Chang-hee’s direction is adept at exploring these inner worlds with a fresh, unsettling approach and a skillful employment of flashbacks that escape the trappings of cliché. Tang’s internal conflict becomes a character unto itself, a study in the complexity of human emotion that Woo-shik channels with an intense authenticity.

Despite these high points, “A Killer Paradox” struggles to balance its ambitious narrative within the confines of an eight-episode run. The series attempts to craft a broader vigilante saga, dissecting the motivations behind acts of self-justice while simultaneously offering a thematic mystery for the audience to unravel. In this, it sometimes loses focus, detracting from what could have been a gripping character study and bloating on its excessive narrative ambitions.

Yet, even with its shortcomings, “A Killer Paradox” stands out as a crafty piece of storytelling, bolstered by compelling performances that anchor the show as a disturbing, yet engrossing television experience. The paradoxical nature of its central figure, a reluctant killer entangled in a destiny of vigilantism, offers viewers a reflective mirror on morality’s ambiguous shades.

For those ready to dive into the murky depths of this psychological thriller, “A Killer Paradox” is currently streaming on Netflix, promising a narrative that, while flawed, resonates with a haunting echo long after the screen fades to black.