Gujarat High Court Takes Action: ‘Maharaj’ Movie Release On Hold Indefinitely
In an unexpected legal development on Thursday, the Gujarat High Court has temporarily halted the release of the much-anticipated Netflix film, ‘Maharaj’. Fans and followers of the streaming giant will now have to wait longer to witness the debut performance of Aamir Khan’s son, Junaid, who was set to grace screens in his inaugural role starting June 14. The film’s storyline is deeply rooted in history, drawing from the infamous Maharaj libel case of 1862, which has stirred considerable controversy.
The origins of this legal halt trace back to a petition lodged by members of the Vaishnavite Pustimargi sect. These individuals, staunch devotees of Bhagwan Shree Krishna, have expressed grave concerns over the film’s portrayal of historical events pertinent to their faith. Petitioners argue that the depiction within ‘Maharaj’ is not only potentially misleading but also likely to incite ‘hatred and violence’ against the Pustimargi sect, creating a ripple effect that infringes on ethical boundaries set by various information technology regulations.
In their detailed petition, the complainants cited contradictions with the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, as well as the Self-regulation Code of Over the Top Technology (OTT) guidelines. These regulations were established to safeguard the nuanced sensibilities of different communities and ensure that digital content adheres strictly to ethical conduct.
Moreover, the petitioners highlighted that their requests for a pre-screening of the film were unjustly denied by the filmmakers. Despite multiple attempts, no clear answers or reassurances regarding the nature of the film’s content were provided. This lack of transparency further added to the tension and prompted the petitioners to seek judicial intervention.
The narrative in question revolves around the 1862 Maharaj libel case—a high-stakes defamation lawsuit during colonial India. Karsandas Mulji, a prominent social reformer, published an article in ‘Satyaprakash,’ a Gujarati weekly journal circulated in Bombay. The article controversially took aim at a Vaishnavite religious leader, accusing him of engaging in inappropriate sexual relationships with his female followers. This exposé led the aggrieved religious figure to file a defamation claim against Karsandas. However, the case culminated in favor of Karsandas, with the British judges of the Bombay Supreme Court dismissing the charges.
.
Amidst this backdrop, the Gujarat High Court has been proactive. Notices have been dispatched to various entities involved, including Netflix India, Yash Raj Films, Netflix’s main branch, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), and the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. An ad-interim order was pronounced, mandating an immediate suspension of the film’s release until the issues raised are thoroughly examined. The court has scheduled the next hearing for June 18, where stakeholders will present their defenses and further clarifications might be expected.
The controversy surrounding ‘Maharaj’ has not been limited to the courtroom. In a digital age where social media wields unparalleled influence, hashtags like ‘#BoycottNetflix’ and ‘#BanMaharajFilm’ have gained significant traction. Activists and concerned social media users have voiced their discontent, fervently calling for a complete ban on the movie. According to these groups, the content of ‘Maharaj’ risks hurting religious sentiments, thereby amplifying the existing discord.
This unfolding story has placed Netflix in a precarious position. The streaming giant must navigate a complicated intersection of artistic expression and community sensitivities. As the petitioners and Netflix prepare for the June 18 hearing, questions surrounding the portrayal of historical events and their impact on contemporary sensibilities remain at the forefront.
The Gujarat High Court’s swift action underscores a larger narrative about the responsibilities that digital platforms bear when showcasing historical and socially sensitive content. This case serves as a poignant reminder of the thin line between creative license and ethical storytelling, especially in a country as diverse and complex as India.
As the situation develops, all eyes will be on the forthcoming hearing, which promises to deliver crucial insights into how India’s legal system balances freedom of expression with communal harmony. Until then, ‘Maharaj’ remains a highly anticipated but temporarily shelved project, leaving its audience, cast, and creators in a state of suspended uncertainty.
