Home > 

High Court Raises Questions on Release of Kangana Ranaut’s ‘Emergency’


The Madhya Pradesh High Court has taken a significant step in addressing concerns surrounding the release of ‘Emergency,’ a movie by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Kangana Ranaut. On Monday, the court issued a notice to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that was filed against the film. The litigation has brought the film under scrutiny for its portrayal of former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and its depiction of the Sikh community.

In addition to the CBFC, the notice has also been sent to Kangana Ranaut, her production house Manikarnika Films, the Central and Madhya Pradesh governments, Zee Studios, and multiple social media platforms including YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook. The Division Bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Vinay Saraf, has requested responses from these parties by September 3, ahead of the next hearing.

The PIL, filed by Sikh organizations Jabalpur Sikh Sangat and Guru Singh Sabha, Indore, challenges the film’s trailer and its representation of Sikhs. The petitioners argue that the portrayal infringes on the fundamental rights of the Sikh community and have demanded an unconditional apology from Kangana Ranaut. Specifically, the use of the term ‘Khalistan’ has drawn ire, with the petitioners asserting that it could stigmatize young Sikh children in schools.

“We have got small children going to the school wearing turbans. Others will tease them as Khalistanis. It is the pride of every Sikh to join the Indian Army. Sri Guru Granth Sahib (religious text of the community) has 1,430 pages and 2,500 times, the word ‘Ram’ has been used. The entire history of Sikhs is so amalgamated with Hindus that you can’t differentiate between Hindus and Sikhs,” stated advocate Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah, who is representing the petitioners.

The PIL also criticizes the film’s director and lead actress, Kangana Ranaut, accusing her of irresponsibility. The petitioners are not just seeking an apology but are also calling for damages to be paid to a Sikh charitable organization.

Join Get ₹99!

.

This film, a biopic on Indira Gandhi, has faced multiple delays and controversies. Initially set for release in November 2023, ‘Emergency’ has seen its launch date pushed back several times. The next scheduled release date is now September 6.

Kangana Ranaut, who also wrote the film, has frequently accused the CBFC of intentionally withholding its release. She has alleged that CBFC officials have received threats concerning the film. These allegations indicate the high-stakes nature of the film’s approval and underline the controversies that have surrounded its production and prospective release.

The court’s decision to issue notices to social media giants such as YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook implies the significant role these platforms play in the dissemination of film content and public opinion. Additionally, the inclusion of Zee Studios, and its Chief Business Officer Umesh Bansal, signifies the broader industry implications and the potential for widespread impact on media practices and content regulations.

The film’s trailer has evidently struck a nerve within the Sikh community, amplifying historical and social sensitivities. By addressing such grievances through legal channels, the petitioners hope to foster a more respectful and accurate portrayal of minority communities in Indian cinema.

This case continues to unfold as the court awaits responses from the notified parties, and it underscores the ongoing debate around artistic freedom, censorship, and the representation of diverse communities in film. As the country watches closely, the judicial scrutiny over ‘Emergency’ could set significant precedents for future film certifications and the portrayal of historical figures and events in Indian cinema.

With each new development, the tension grows between filmmakers who seek to tell bold stories and communities concerned about their representation. The outcome of this case will not only determine the fate of ‘Emergency’ but may also influence the broader landscape of Indian filmmaking and the complex relationship between creative expression and social responsibility.