In a dramatic turn of events in Hyderabad, popular Telugu actor Naga Chaitanya has vehemently opposed comments made by Telangana Congress Minister Konda Surekha regarding his divorce from actress Samantha Ruth Prabhu. Taking to social media platform X on Wednesday, Naga Chaitanya expressed his anger and dissatisfaction with the statements made by the minister, labeling the claims as “absolutely ridiculous and unacceptable.” He emphasized that the decision to divorce was a mutual one between him and his former wife, reflecting a mature resolution to part ways.
Naga Chaitanya’s statement detailed the emotional process of arriving at such a decision, describing divorce as a significant and emotionally challenging choice. He stated, “The decision of divorce is easily one of the most painful and unfortunate life decisions one has to make. After a lot of thought, a mutual decision was made by me and my former spouse to part ways.” Chaitanya continued to explain that the decision was made peacefully, considering their varied life goals and personal dynamics, underscoring the need to move forward respectfully and gracefully. His response came amidst swirling speculation and rumors, which he called “baseless and completely ridiculous.” Despite the ongoing gossip, Chaitanya maintained a dignified silence up until now, attributing his reticence to a profound respect for both his ex-wife and their families.
The controversy erupted earlier in the week when Congress leader Konda Surekha made explosive claims linking the divorce of the celebrity couple to political machinations. Surekha went so far as to involve KT Rama Rao (KTR), alleging that his influence was an underlying factor in the separation. Further, Surekha alleged that KTR, during his tenure as a minister, engaged in covert activities including tapping the phones of actresses and subsequently blackmailing them. These accusations escalated into a significant political and social frenzy.
Reacting to the minister’s incendiary comments, Naga Chaitanya declared, “Today, the claim made by Minister Konda Surekha garu is not only false, it is absolutely ridiculous and unacceptable.
. Women deserve to be supported and respected.” He expressed his disappointment over the exploitation of personal matters for media attention, calling it “shameful.”
In a parallel response, Samantha Ruth Prabhu took to Instagram to address the controversy ignited by Surekha’s remarks. She firmly stated that her divorce is a personal affair resolved through mutual consent and on amicable terms. Samantha requested that people cease speculation and respect the private nature of the issue, reaffirming that no political conspiracy played a role in their split. She eloquently articulated the journey of a woman within the film industry, a space where women often face objectification, emphasizing the courage required to love, lose, and continue persevering.
The remarks by Minister Surekha induced widespread condemnation not only from the public but also from within political circles and from leading figures in the film industry such as superstar Nagarjuna Akkineni, who also voiced his disapproval of the minister’s comments. According to multiple sources, several BRS leaders also condemned the remarks, further fueling the ongoing debate.
The allegations and the subsequent fallout underscore the tangled web of politics and personal lives of celebrities, who often find themselves under intense public scrutiny. This incident highlights the broader societal issues surrounding privacy, respect for personal decisions, and the challenges faced by public figures in maintaining their personal dignity amidst intense public and media scrutiny.
For many observers and fans of the actor and actress, the incident serves as a reminder of the courage required to live life in the limelight. As both Naga Chaitanya and Samantha Ruth Prabhu attempt to navigate the complexities of their personal lives merged with their public personas, their responses highlight the need for respectful acknowledgment of their personal choices, away from political opportunism and sensational headlines. With the controversy still unfolding, the resolution calls for a collective pause to reflect on the human element behind the headlines—respecting personal choices and cherishing privacy.
