Home > 

‘Players’ movie review: Gina Rodriguez’s Valentine rom-com is stuck in genre stalemate


The universe of romantic comedies often gravitates towards recognizable tropes and narratives, as they attempt to recreate the magic of stories that audiences have adored for decades. Nevertheless, certain themes feel rooted in their original era, losing their luster when transplanted into modern settings. Such is the case with Netflix’s “Players,” a romantic gamble that falls short in its quest for contemporary relevance amidst bygone conventions of the genre.

At first glance, “Players” seems to revisit a formula made popular by the likes of “How I Met Your Mother,” particularly the notorious “Playbook” wielded by Barney Stinson. In a similar vein, the movie introduces a quartet of friends—Mackenzie (Gina Rodriguez), Adam (Damon Wayans Jr.), Sam (Augustus Prew), and Little (Joel Courtney)—who have perfected the art of the one-night stand using the same strategic playbooks. United by their shared pursuit and mutual disdain for love, their routine is rocked by the arrival of the enigmatic Nick (Tom Ellis), a seasoned war correspondent whose allure is impossible for Mack to resist.

Despite the group’s tried-and-true strategies, Mack’s conquest of Nick leads to an unexpected twist. After their inevitable romantic encounter, Mack faces an unfamiliar battleground of emotions—she finds herself genuinely drawn to Nick. The problem escalates as the crew concocts an elaborate ‘play’ to navigate Mack’s newfound feelings, which seem to defy the detachment they so proudly preserved. The unfolding events predictably tiptoe around the plot’s predictable options—whether this ends in the realization that love isn’t a code to be cracked or in heartbreak at the hands of an elusive paramour.

As the story treads through these well-worn paths, there’s a sense of what “Players” could have been with a few more rounds of script refinement. Occasionally, the film’s latter half glimpses at a depth that belies its lackluster opening, hinting at a more nuanced narrative that struggles to break free from its formulaic shell.

In the midst of this, a stand-up analogy offered by the Scottish comedian Daniel Sloss looms large, reflecting our societal obsession with pairing off and the extraordinary lengths many pursue in the quest for love. Watching Mack’s character partake in this universal journey invokes not only empathy but also a yearning for a storyline that daringly explores the complexities of modern relationships.

A refreshing touch is added by Mack’s side projects, which include unconventional activities like chessboxing, hinting at the potential for a more compelling tale. Furthermore, the allure of a possible romantic narrative involving a writer and war correspondent like Nick begs for deeper exploration. It’s in these moments viewers may glimpse the untapped potential for an engaging story about the lives of journalists, their work, and their love lives. A poignant scene captures Mack wrestling with her career’s integrity versus commercial demands, articulating a familiar dilemma that resonates with any creative professional.

Yet, these brief segments of insight cannot compensate for the overarching disappointment felt in this narrative with such a talented cast. “Players” struggles to find its unique voice within the rom-com framework, leaving viewers to contemplate whether the periodic moments of sincerity justify the viewing experience.

Now available on Netflix, “Players” invites you to stream and witness this cinematic rendezvous for yourselves. However, as the credits roll, one might be left to wonder—were the better-late-than-never moments of promise enough to salvage a story caught in a genre stalemate? The audience, much like the characters within the film, must navigate the terrain between hopeful idealism and the stark realities of love in the modern age.